Live Nation/Ticketmaster: NY Times Editorial

February 10, 2010 by stevenl154
February 9, 2010
Editorial/ NY Times

President Obama has made a welcome break with the Bush administration’s disregard for enforcing antitrust law. The Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission have become more aggressive about questioning mergers and challenging monopolies and anticompetitive behavior.

But antitrust regulation still suffers from an unwillingness to challenge “vertical integration,” in which companies, suppliers and customers become intertwined and a few corporations can control all aspects of their industry. Such is the case in the merger of Ticketmaster and Live Nation, which was approved with some limitations by the Justice Department’s antitrust division recently. Ideally, the merger should not have been.

Competition had been growing between the two. Live Nation, the country’s biggest concert promoter that also owned and operated venues, established a ticketing subsidiary. Ticketmaster Entertainment, the biggest ticketing company, bought a tour management business for top artists. The merger created Live Nation Entertainment, a juggernaut that has it all. It will be tough for a band to tour without doing business with the new firm.

The Justice Department challenged the “horizontal” consolidation of the companies’ overlapping ticketing businesses. But it was weaker when it came to dealing with the perils that arise from the emergence of a company that will operate on every level of its business.

It required Live Nation Entertainment to sell a ticketing subsidiary and license its ticketing software to a rival promoter, AEG Live, which will thus be able to compete across the business lines. It forbade Live Nation Entertainment from bundling ticketing with other parts of the business to keep rivals out, and it prohibited retaliation against venues that didn’t use its ticket service. But these prohibitions will prove difficult to enforce. And there is nothing to stop anticompetitive bundling of tour management, concert promotions and venues.

The Justice Department’s trustbusters argue that there was little else they could do. They could be right. There was a risk that Live Nation would sell its ticket service if the merger was blocked and simply sign a contract with Ticketmaster. Moreover, courts have generally been skeptical of antitrust challenges to vertical integration because they provide so many cost savings to the merged companies.

But the kind of consolidation embodied by Live Nation Entertainment is tremendously worrisome. Live Nation could easily shut out independent promoters — who don’t have their own venues and ticket services. This could reduce diversity in the music market. The cost savings that are supposed to flow from these mergers never seem to accrue to consumers because the mergers leave so little competition in their wake.

The mechanisms of antitrust regulation are not up to this challenge. The Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission must take a risk and take one of these mergers to court. Even a loss would be helpful. If antitrust legislation, as it stands, proves unable to stop the foreclosure of competition, maybe Congress will take notice and act to maintain a competitive playing field.

Recorded music as a propellant into prosperity is no longer viable.

February 9, 2010 by stevenl154

Dave Kusek/Future of Music

Here’s a pretty telling graph – Recorded music sales over time since 1999.   This is the truth.

oh my

If you are trying to make money selling recordings, or producing them you are selling into a market that is auguring into the earth.  If you are a pure-play label – either cash out soon and go home before it’s really too late, or start writing a new business plan.  It is time for you to start over.

If you really want to do 360 deals, then get the capacity, personnel and expertise to actually produce results or you are toast.  Todays nimble entrepreneurs and emerging music service environment is going to eat your lunch.  Specialization is in, generalization is out.

If you are a record producer or engineer, create other products to produce.  Broaden your horizons.   What are you going to be a producer of?  What “insanely great” product can you create?

If you think you can survive in the recorded music business, find something else to sell.  Simple as that.  There is no recovery from this decline.  Sure songwriters and publishers can still make money licensing for film, TV and new media (like ring tones), but the engine that has driven the music business for the past 60 years has run out of steam.

Recorded music as a propellant into prosperity is no longer viable.

Accept this fact, move on and adapt.  Use this as a jumping off point.  Reinvent yourself or your business.

This has been my mantra for the past 6 or 7 years.  If this RIAA graph above is not evidence enough, then I don’t know what is.  If you think being signed by a “record label” is your ticket to ride, then nice to have known you.   Enough already.  I can’t believe how many people still want this.  American Idol?

And if you are the RIAA, and think trying to preserve recorded music as a “business” is a sound investment, I would advise you look for another job, and soon.  Gaming Soundscan to count T-Shirts as a way of propping up the numbers and thinking everything is ok is self deception.  Look around you.

This is the truth people.  Recorded music sales are going to end as a viable business driver ’cause it is just not working anymore and is an outmoded concept of what music was all about.  “Digital” tracks are not going to cut it as they have been conceived thus far because it is just the same thing in a different form.  Fixing music in time makes no more sense.  Music is more fluid than ever.  Subscription revenue and streaming licenses are not going to support anyone when they are optional.  We need something new, something bold.

MTV morphs…

February 9, 2010 by stevenl154

MTV loses iconic logo’s music video and ‘music television’ tag and replaces with network talent

BY Cristina Kinon
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER 2/9/10

MTV unveils its new logo, with reality stars to replace the music video and ‘music television’ tag.

It’s MTV, minus the “music television.”

The network that launched the video about killing the radio star has redesigned its iconic logo – to take out the music video.

The new look, revealed on-air yesterday, features the original 3-D large “M” with the small, graffiti-style “tv” on the right side. But the new design is expanded, so that photos of MTV talent, including the cast of “Jersey Shore,” “The Buried Life” and “My Life as Liz,” can be seen through it.

And, for the first time in almost 30 years, the logo drops the “music television” tag line altogether.

“We were really thinking about it in terms of having the brand and our talent living in the same space together,” Tina Exarhos, executive vice president of marketing and multiplatform creative projects, told The News.

“If you watch the channel, you’ve seen that it’s definitely going in a new direction,” said Exarhos. “We really wanted to see the logo featured in a new way, and this was really meant to be able to house all the great things that are happening at MTV at any given time.”

Exarhos said the network started thinking about an overall redesign at the end of last year. While other aspects of MTV had evolved, the logo was always something that had stayed the same, and talk of updating it seemed almost blasphemous.

“I’ve been at MTV a long time, and as it was reinvented over the years and maintained sort of a fluid nature, we never touched our logo, which is sort of ironic,” Exarhos said. “It’s a fantastic, iconic logo, but it wasn’t working for us in a way that we needed it to anymore. It needed to express more about what MTV is today, not what it was in 1981.”

Over the past few years, MTV has come under fire from critics and fans who say the network known for music television no longer played music videos. And while fans can check out artists on sister stations MTV2, MTV Hits and MTV Tr3s, MTV itself has moved on to more reality and, in the upcoming months, scripted programming.

Ditching the longstanding “music television” tag line seems like a signal that the network has accepted where it now stands.

“From a truly design perspective, we didn’t look at losing ‘music television’ for any other reason than from a functionality standpoint,” said Exarhos. “But we realized that it would have an impact if we took that off. I think those who watch MTV today think about it as much broader than music television.

“Music is still at the heart of everything we do, but it’s about a lot more now,” she added. “If MTV didn’t change, we’d be irrelevant.”

Frank Olinsky and his team at Manhattan Design created the MTV logo when the network launched. When the change was announced yesterday, Olinsky wasn’t feeling much nostalgia.

“I had no idea” the change was coming, said Olinsky. “MTV now is a whole other reality than MTV was back in the day. Things change. The fact that it doesn’t say ‘music television’ anymore, that’s appropriate.”

EMI’s Battle of the Bands: Citigroup Is Up Next

February 8, 2010 by stevenl154
By DEVIN LEONARD 2/7/10 NY Times

AFTER the Grammy Awards last Sunday, the stars came out for EMI’s party at the W Hollywood Hotel. The country music hunk Keith Urban arrived with his wife, Nicole Kidman. Katy (“I Kissed a Girl”) Perry sparkled in a form-fitting dress that would become gossip fodder on the Internet. There were also rappers (Cypress Hill), guitar heroes (Slash and Dave Navarro) and a coffeehouse darling (Norah Jones).

There was one person, however, whose absence was conspicuous at the soirée: Guy Hands, the chairman of Terra Firma, the British private equity firm that bought EMI, the music publishing and recording company, for what it now says was $8 billion at the peak of the credit bubble in 2007.

Mr. Hands was once a mainstay at such glitzy affairs, happy to pose for pictures with the likes of Ms. Perry. Now, he is less eager to be seen at those events because, by his own acknowledgment, the EMI acquisition has been a disaster for his firm and his investors.

As soon as Terra Firma took control, Mr. Hands spoke publicly about the need to drastically reduce artist advances at EMI and immediately alienated some of the storied company’s most famous acts. Radiohead and the Rolling Stones departed. Lily Allen, a major star in England, told the British press, “I hate Terra Firma.”

“I don’t think he appreciated how sensitive and unpredictable artists can be,” says Bill Werde, editorial director of Billboard. “It seemed to me at the time that he looked at artists like just another asset — like the company’s distribution channel or its music publishing company.”

But the real clash has been between Mr. Hands and Citigroup, the bank that financed the EMI acquisition and many other Terra Firma deals. Terra Firma used only $3 billion of its investors’ cash to buy the music company; it borrowed the remaining $5.2 billion from Citi. Why was Terra Firma’s lender so generous? The bank thought it could later offload this debt by selling it in smaller chunks to other investors.

Then reality intruded. Before the deal closed in August 2007, the credit market froze — leaving Citi holding a vast bag of debt that it designated as “substandard.” The transaction offered yet another example of the kind of promiscuous lending that forced the government to rescue Citi the next year.

Two and a half years later, EMI’s results are improving. The company says its revenue for the most recent fiscal year, ended last March, was $2.4 billion, an increase of 7.4 percent from the previous year. Last week, “Need You Now,” the new album by EMI’s breakout country music act, Lady Antebellum, topped the Billboard 200.

Even so, the company still had a net loss of $1.6 billion during the fiscal year, and it still isn’t generating enough cash to cover the debt that was larded onto EMI’s books to finance Mr. Hands’s takeover. In the last 17 months, Terra Firma has breached loan covenants on its EMI debt five times and has had to inject nearly $150 million into the ailing company to stave off default.

Mr. Hands tried restructuring his deal with Citi, but the talks broke down in October. People familiar with the discussions, who requested anonymity because the talks are confidential, say Citi believes that Terra Firma’s equity in EMI is worthless and that the firm should hand over the company to the bank.

Mr. Hands, who declined to be interviewed, doesn’t give up so easily. He hired David Boies, who is to the legal profession what Bono is to arena rock, to do battle with Citi. In December, Terra Firma sued Citi in New York State Supreme Court, accusing the bank of defrauding the private equity firm. The suit, which has been moved to federal court in Manhattan, highlights the dual role Citi played in the transaction as both an adviser to EMI’s former management on the sale and Terra Firm’s lender — a common practice in the private equity boom.

No matter the outcome, the lawsuit has illuminated the relationship between Citi and Britain’s most famous private equity investor. After a string of successful deals together, the investor and his bankers plunged into a catastrophic deal that is emblematic of the credit boom’s excesses.

Terra Firma’s lawyers say David Wormsley, one of Citi’s top London dealmakers, didn’t inform Mr. Hands in the final hours of a bidding war for EMI that Terra Firma’s only rival, Cerberus Capital Management, had dropped out. Instead, the complaint says, Mr. Wormsley urged Mr. Hands to offer an inflated price for EMI.

Mr. Boies and his team say the Citi executive’s alleged failure to convey that fact was “at minimum, negligent, and fell below the standard to be expected of a reasonably competent investment banker in Mr. Wormsley’s position.”

A Citi spokeswoman, Danielle Romero-Apsilos, denies the lawsuit’s claims. “We believe this suit is without merit, and we will defend ourselves vigorously,” she said, declining to comment further. Citi’s lawyers at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison argue that the case should be heard in Britain, where many of the events in Terra Firma’s complaint transpired.

This could complicate matters for Mr. Hands. Last year, he moved to Guernsey, a tax haven in the Channel Islands, and can therefore spend only a limited amount of time on British soil. Not surprisingly, his lawyers counter that Terra Firma and Citi had plenty of dealings in New York, Citi’s base.

Some people in the industry say Terra Firma’s suit is merely a negotiating ploy meant to recoup part of its EMI investment and to avoid reputational damage that would make it harder for the firm to raise money in the future.

“It sounds to me like a textbook case of a private equity firm that bet the ranch, and now it has buyer’s remorse” says Paul Povel, a finance professor at the University of Houston who has studied Mr. Hands’s industry.

Jonathan H. Sherman, a Boies, Schiller & Flexner partner and Terra Firma’s chief litigator in the case, dismisses that notion. “At the heart of this case is an allegation as serious as it is simple,” Mr. Sherman says. Citi, he says, “induced Terra Firma to invest $3 billion by manufacturing the appearance of competition in an auction when it knew the auction was a bust. That is fraud.”

IN Britain, Guy Hands is a financial rock star. He has amassed a tidy fortune by snapping up undervalued assets like British pubs, European movie theaters and roadside concession stands in Germany and wringing cash out of them after borrowing the money he needed to buy them.

Along the way, he became the British equivalent of the Blackstone Group’s founder, Stephen A. Schwarzman. Mr. Hands owns a 12th-century estate in Tuscany, where he produces wine and olive oil. He has an enormous collection of karaoke records, and, on at least one occasion, has belted out “My Way” after an exhausting day of deal-making.

Citi played a key role in Mr. Hands’s ascent, with Mr. Wormsley bringing him some of his best deals. According to several people familiar with the dealings of Terra Firma and Citi, Mr. Hands’s other close contact at the bank was Michael S. Klein, a rising star who would become the head of Citi’s investment banking operation and was in a position to help arrange financing for these transactions.

Mr. Wormsley and Mr. Klein declined to be interviewed for this article.

The three men enjoyed one another’s company. According to people familiar with their extracurricular activities, Mr. Wormsley regularly took Mr. Hands and his wife, Julia, to the opera in London. Mr. Hands reciprocated by making his Italian vineyard available for the 40th birthday party of Mr. Wormsley’s wife, Vicky. For his part, Mr. Klein invited Mr. Hands and his wife, Julie, to his 40th birthday on Barbados.

So not surprisingly, according to the suit, Mr. Hands listened intently when Mr. Wormsley called him in November 2006 to tell him another company was for sale: EMI. And EMI seemed to fit the mold Mr. Hands preferred: a troubled enterprise with untapped value.

One of the company’s founders, Emile Berliner, invented the disk phonograph record in 1887. Over the years, EMI became a force in the music industry. In 1955, it bought Capitol, the American company whose roster included Frank Sinatra; . the company signed the Beatles seven years later.

EMI’s publishing division, meanwhile, amassed copyrights to songs from “Over the Rainbow” to ones made famous by Kanye West and Beyoncé.

EMI seemed to lose its momentum in 2001 after its Virgin Records unit unfurled a bomb: Mariah Carey’s album “Glitter,” which did so poorly that the company had to pay the singer $28 million to sever its relationship with her.

“After that, it was all about, ‘Have you hit your numbers this week?,’ ” says Ted Cohen, a former EMI senior vice president who now runs a consulting business. “I think they just took their eyes off the ball when it came to the creative side of the business.”

EMI’s weaknesses became abundantly clear in the last decade, when the industry was shaken by music piracy and declining CD sales. Unlike all but one of its rivals, the Warner Music Group, it was a standalone, publicly traded music company. In 2005, EMI’s stock tumbled when it revealed that forthcoming albums from its hit bands, Coldplay and Gorillaz, wouldn’t arrive on schedule.

This prompted it to seek an acquirer the next year. In strolled Mr. Hands — right behind a number of his rivals, including Cerberus; JPMorgan Chase’s buyout unit, One Equity Partners; and the Fortress Investment Group, all of which submitted preliminary bids for EMI in April 2007.

IN conversations recounted in court documents, Mr. Hands told Mr. Wormsley that he would need Citi’s backing for an EMI bid because he was coming in on his rivals’ heels.

According to the lawsuit, Mr. Wormsley alerted Citi’s debt team and, shortly thereafter, Mr. Klein sent Terra Firma’s founder an e-mail saying he was “personally involved” in getting the deal underwritten.

EMI then told its suitors that they would have to present their final offers on a Monday in May 2007. One Equity and Fortress dropped out. Terra Firma’s lawyers say Cerberus abandoned its hunt the day before the meeting. Cerberus declined to comment. The lawyers contend, however, that Mr. Wormsley prodded Mr. Hands until early Monday morning, telling him he needed to submit a high number if he didn’t want to lose EMI to his firm’s American rival.

“Citi’s representations to Terra Firma were knowingly false” Terra Firma’s lawyers said in their complaint.

Once Terra Firma submitted its binding offer for EMI, however, there was still a two-month closing period, during which the financial world began to unravel. While it would be another year before Wall Street approached an outright breakdown, the debt markets went into a coma as traders realized the severity of the subprime mortgage crisis (which Citi had played a pivotal role in fomenting.)

It soon became clear that Citi wouldn’t be able to syndicate the billions in debt it took on to do the deal. It also meant that Terra Firma would have difficulty refinancing or raising more money in the future.

In hindsight, Terra Firma could have exited the deal before it was completed, and there were opportunities to do just that. According to people familiar with the closing process, Cerberus approached Terra Firma with an offer to put equity into EMI, which would have reduced the British firm’s investment. Terra Firma, however, has a policy of not doing “club deals” with other private equity firms. So it spurned Cerberus’s advances.

Citi could also have shut down the deal altogether but chose otherwise. A person with knowledge of Citi’s deliberations, who requested anonymity because of the litigation, says the bank was fearful of losing its standing with private equity borrowers if it abandoned a longstanding client like Terra Firma. So Citi stayed in.

In a sworn statement filed last week, Mr. Hands said Mr. Klein arranged for him to meet with Charles Prince, then Citi’s chief executive, to discuss the deal in New York five days before the closing. Shortly afterward, Mr. Hands said, Mr. Klein set up a telephone call between Terra Firma’s founder and Edgar Bronfman Jr., C.E.O. of the Warner Music Group.

Mr. Hands said in his statement that he made the call to Mr. Bronfman because he eventually wanted to merge EMI with Warner Music. Warner Music declined to comment, and Mr. Prince could not be reached for comment.

Even before Mr. Hands completed the acquisition of EMI, cracks in the Terra Firma-Citi relationship were already beginning to show — including some frosty closing meetings in New York, where Citi tightened the covenants on Terra Firma’s debt. Nevertheless, Mr. Hands remained confident. Even if Terra Firma violated its covenants, it could avoid default by injecting more equity into the company. Terra Firma raised $200 million from investors like the Canadian Pension Plan and set it aside for this purpose.

The music industry has a long, tortured history of treating outsiders roughly. (Think of the animosity directed at the former NBC president Andy Lack when he took over SonyBMG.)

But Mr. Hands was a fairly sharp-elbowed guy himself. He granted autonomy to EMI’s profitable music publishing business. But as soon as the deal closed in 2007, he inserted himself into the day-to-day operations of the recorded music division, eliciting a hue and cry from artists and their managers about heavy-handedness.

That didn’t stop Mr. Hands. He cut the recorded music division’s payroll of 4,500 by a third, bolstering EMI’s cash flow. Still, hopes for a 51 percent increase in digital music sales — a key element in Mr. Hands’s turnaround plan— didn’t materialize.

EMI’s hit-making apparatus, meanwhile, remained moribund. According to Nielsen SoundScan, EMI had only one album — “Viva la Vida” by Coldplay — in the annual Top 10 in the United States in 2008. As a result, sales and profits plummeted, and by the end of 2008, Terra Firma had written down its EMI investment by 90 percent.

MR. HANDS, meanwhile, relinquished his managerial duties at EMI to Elio Leoni-Sceti, a former brand manager for Reckitt Benckiser, the consumer products company with brands like Mop & Glo, French’s Mustard and Lysol. Mr. Leoni-Sceti had no previous music experience before taking the job. But according to Billboard’s Mr. Werde, he is a less polarizing figure than Terra Firma’s founder, and has done a surprisingly good job of repositioning the company.

“What EMI and Terra Firma need more than anything is time,” says Jon Cohen, a music promoter who is working with Mr. Leoni-Sceti’s team. “They are under so much pressure with all that debt.”

But time may be running out. In a recent corporate filing, Terra Firma says it has exhausted all but $15 million of a $200 million financing line it had created to resolve covenant violations. The company is trying to raise $188 million to avoid defaulting on its next covenant test in March.

All of this lent a sense of urgency to Mr. Hands’s attempts to restructure the company’s debt. But he is no longer dealing with some of his old mates at Citi. Mr. Klein left in 2008 after a management shakeup caused by the bank’s near-collapse. Mr. Wormsley remains at Citi.

Indeed, until talks fell apart in September, Mr. Hands sat across the table from bankers interested in one thing: getting Citi’s money back. He offered to put $1.6 billion into EMI if Citi wrote down that amount. That would have left Terra Firma in control of a company with a more manageable debt-to-equity ratio.

Citi’s position was that Terra Firma’s equity in the company was worthless and that Mr. Hands should therefore just hand over the company in exchange for a small percentage of the upside if the bank could later sell it.

Richard X. Bove, a banking analyst at Rochdale Securities, says Citi has written down nearly all of its EMI debt. “I think they think they have a pretty good chance at getting something back now,” Mr. Bove says.

There would be no shortage of bidders for EMI Publishing, which has remained healthy through all the turmoil. As for the recorded music division, there is one likely buyer: Warner Music. In December, Richard Greenfield, a media analyst at Pali Research, wrote that Warner Music was “hoarding cash” in the hope of doing just that sometime in the coming year. In short, it could be Citi that sells EMI to Warner instead of Terra Firma, which would be a cruel irony for Mr. Hands.

Then again, it’s unlikely that either Terra Firma or EMI will emerge from their mutual woes without feeling more pain. Claire Enders, a London-based media analyst who has followed the deal closely, says that there is no other way it could have ended.

“For Terra Firma, it was ego,” she says. “Citigroup did not want to be the one that brought the party to an end. But this was the pin coming out of the private equity balloon. After that, it went poof.”

The Who, and the Super Bowl’s Evolving Halftime Show

February 7, 2010 by stevenl154

The Who, and How the Halftime Show Matured – NYTimes.com

February 3, 2010

Once upon a time, a Super Bowl halftime show meant Carol Channing, college marching bands, Up With People and salutes to Louis Armstrong. These days, headliners like the Rolling Stones and Paul McCartney happily line up to play a 12-minute set.

This year, the Who is headlining the show, a curious choice because the band has not released an album of new songs in four years and its first farewell tour was in 1982, before many people who will be watching the game were born.

Bill Curbishley, the Who’s manager for 39 years, jumped at the chance to play. Performing at the Super Bowl, he knows, means reaching about 100 million television viewers, a great way to promote the band’s new greatest hits album, publicize a coming tour and reach fans who might know the Who only because its songs are heard on the “CSI” television shows.

“I don’t think it will sell millions and millions of albums, but it will definitely have an impact,” Curbishley said. “If you get into people’s consciousness, it helps.”

The results are often immediate. In the week after Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers performed at the Super Bowl two years ago, sales of the band’s greatest hits album tripled, according to Nielsen SoundScan. Their songs also climbed the charts before the Super Bowl because of commercials publicizing the halftime show during playoff games.

The N.F.L. does not pay an appearance fee, though it does cover all of the expenses for the band and its often ample entourage of several dozen stagehands, family and friends.

Those costs are more than offset by the three-year sponsorship deal the league has with Bridgestone estimated to be worth about $10 million. Merchandise specific to the halftime show like T-shirts and hats with the Who’s name on them generate extra revenue.

Bridgestone’s sponsorship of the halftime show is an extension of its wider deal with the N.F.L. The company’s name is announced frequently in promotional ads during the playoffs and appears in a customized logo, which is onscreen for about half of each band’s 12-minute set. Bridgestone is featured with the N.F.L. in print advertisements, and two of its television spots are played during the first and second halves.

The company also receives access to a suite and about 100 tickets to the game, which are used by executives and customers.

Bridgestone is trying to renew its sponsorship deal with the N.F.L. because the event has helped increase tire sales. The company says that its market share has grown by double digits in the first quarter in each of the last two years, while other brands in the industry have had their share decline in the same period, according to John Baratta, the president of Bridgestone’s consumer replacement tire business.

Although the company says it cannot attribute all of its gains to the halftime sponsorship, “the image of our brand has been elevated as a result of the tie-ins with these major events,” said Baratta, who added that the company’s core customers, men ages 25 to 54, were the biggest group of Super Bowl viewers.

The N.F.L. has sold halftime sponsorships since 1993, the year after Fox broadcast its popular show “In Living Color” during the halftime show, drawing viewers away.

To compete, the N.F.L. brought in Arlen Kantarian from Radio City Productions to work on Michael Jackson’s “Heal the World” performance in Pasadena, Calif.

The show was more expensive to produce, so the league sold a halftime sponsorship to Frito-Lay.

“It offset the extra cost to the league,” said Jim Steeg, the chief operating officer of the San Diego Chargers, who was the league’s vice president for special events. The halftime show budgets before then were “less than seven figures,” he said.

Bridgestone and other sponsors are not consulted about the choice of musical acts. That is up to the N.F.L. and specifically to Charles Coplin, the league’s vice president for programming. The league used to outsource the production of the halftime show. That stopped after Janet Jackson’s infamous ”wardrobe malfunction” in 2004.

Now, the league chooses bands and handles the production itself. It even filters the songs that cannot be sung during the performance.

The Who, Coplin said, was chosen because its music is familiar to many viewers and plays well in big stadiums. He said the recent spate of older bands was no guarantee another one would be chosen for next year’s Super Bowl, which will be in Arlington, Tex. Either way, he figures to have no trouble finding acts willing to play.

“It’s become the ‘Ed Sullivan Show’ of its time,” Coplin said.

Music’s lost decade: Sales cut in half

February 7, 2010 by stevenl154

chart_music.top.gifBy David Goldman, staff writer CNN.com February 3, 2010: 9:52 AM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — If you watched the Grammy Awards Sunday night, it would appear all is well in the recording industry. But at the end of last year, the music business was worth half of what it was ten years ago and the decline doesn’t look like it will be slowing anytime soon.

Total revenue from U.S. music sales and licensing plunged to $6.3 billion in 2009, according to Forrester Research. In 1999, that revenue figure topped $14.6 billion.

Although the Recording Industry Association of America will report its official figures in the early spring, the trend has been very clear: RIAA has reported declining revenue in nine of the past 10 years, with album sales falling an average of 8% each year. Last decade was the first ever in which sales were lower going out than coming in.

“There have been a lot of changes over the past 10 years,” said Joshua Friedlander, vice president of research at RIAA. “The industry is adapting to consumer’s demands of how they listen to music, when and where, and we’ve had some growing pains in terms of monetizing those changes.”

The two recessions during the decade certainly didn’t help music sales. It’s also a bit unfair to compare the 2000s with the 1990s, since the ’90s enjoyed an unnatural sales boost when consumers replaced their cassette tapes and vinyl records en masse with CDs.

But industry insiders and experts argue that the main culprit for the industry’s massive decline was the growing popularity of digital music.

“The digital music business has been a war of attrition that nobody seems to be winning,” said David Goldberg, the former head of Yahoo music. “The CD is still disappearing, and nothing is replacing it in entirety as a revenue generator.”

The disease of free

The battle for paying digital customers may have been lost before it had truly begun. In 1999, Napster, a free online file-sharing service, made its debut. Not only did Napster help change the way most people got music, it also lowered the price point from $14 for a CD to free.

“It’s pretty easy to give away something for free,” said Russell Frackman, the lead attorney for the music industry in its 1999 case against Napster. “It’s not that the music industry thought the technology was bad, it just objected to the use to which it was being put.

Apple’s (AAPL, Fortune 500) iTunes is credited with finally getting people to pay for digital music, but it wasn’t unveiled until 2003.

In the time between Napster’s shuttering and iTunes’ debut, many of Napster’s 60 million users found other online file sharing techniques to get music for free. Even after iTunes got people buying music tracks for just 99 cents, it wasn’t as attractive as free.

“That four-year lag is where the music industry lost the battle,” said Sonal Gandhi, music analyst with Forrester Research. “They lost an opportunity to take consumers’ new behavior and really monetize it in a way that nipped the free music expectation in the bud.”

Now just 44% of U.S. Internet users and 64% of Americans who buy digital music think that that music is worth paying for, according to Forrester. The volume of unauthorized downloads continues to represent about 90% of the market, according to online download tracker BigChampagne Media Measurement.

“People will steal music regardless, so it’s not worth trying to fight against something where the fight’s already over,” said Dan Ingala, founder and lead singer of the band Plushgun.

When Plushgun released its album “Pins and Panzers,” it was the most downloaded album on the popular peer-to-peer Web site What.cd with more than 10,000 illegally downloaded tracks.

“It’s just a matter of adjusting,” said Ingala. “At the same time, it’s helping us create an audience.”

Where we’re headed

The problem for the music industry may actually be its greatest opportunity. Despite the great decline in sales, the Internet has exposed consumers to more music than ever before. But that accessibility has been difficult to monetize.

The music industry has tried to keep up by licensing ringtones, licensing music on popular Internet radio stations like MySpace Music and Pandora and licensing music videos on YouTube. Digital licensing revenue reached $84 million in 2009, and it is expected to grow substantially in the coming year. (See correction below.)

Licensing fees don’t make up for the volume of total lost sales, but Gandhi says the fact that the music industry is finally embracing these new technologies and revenue streams means the industry is finally getting it.

She said the combined effect of interactive multimedia, a growth in digital licensing and services such as Lala, which was bought by Apple in December, will ultimately help give sales a boost.

“The industry is actively doing a lot of things that are putting us back on the right path,” said RIAA’s Friedlander. “We’re switching to an access model from a purchase model.”

Forrester forecasts music industry revenues will continue to decline until it reaches about $5.5 billion a year by 2014, as new revenue sources begin to lift sales again.

How Lady Gaga took Stefani Germanotta from New York’s Convent of the Sacred Heart to super stardom

February 7, 2010 by stevenl154

DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER/Michale O’Keefe

Sunday, February 7th 2010, 4:00 AM

Lady Gaga performs onstage during the 52nd Annual Grammy Awards on January 31, 2010.

Winter/Getty

Lady Gaga performs onstage during the 52nd Annual Grammy Awards on January 31, 2010.

Stefani Germanotta (now Lady Gaga) in her senior year class portrait from Convent of the Sacred Heart in New York. CLICK PIC for more Lady Gaga photos.

Stefani Germanotta (now Lady Gaga) in her senior year class portrait from Convent of the Sacred Heart in New York.

For a mega-sta full of surprises, it was no surprise Lady Gaga stole the show at this year’s way-over-the-top Grammy Awards.

For starters, she won two Grammys: “Poker Face” was best dance recording and “The Fame” earned the award for best electronic-dance album.

She wore three different outfits — each more bizarre than the previous, from a risque, heart-shaped stunner to a spiky silver headdress with matching gown.

And she wowed the audience by segueing from a powerful “Poker Face” to a duet with Elton John, with both looking like orphans out of a Dickens novel, and John tweaking the lyrics of “Your Song:” “How wonderful life is, with Gaga in the world.”

“It’s amazing, but not surprising that people have gravitated to her,” says Jeff Rabhan, a music industry executive who has worked with Jermaine Dupri and J.Lo, and heads NYU’s Clive Davis department of recorded music.

“Artists have not done a lot to differentiate themselves recently. If you look at Beyoncé or Alicia Keys, they’ve been very traditional in their approach. People are looking for something different.”

Lady Gaga certainly is different: a contradiction whose lyrics are X-rated, but who’s also a sweet Italian-American girl from the West Side who adores her parents.

She’s met Queen Elizabeth and been interviewed by Oprah, but says she misses the days when she played lower East Side dives and clubs like the Bitter End.

She coos on stage and on her records like a traditional sex kitten, but revels in her bisexuality and does nothing to dispel rumors she is a hermaphrodite.

Lady Gaga leans heavily on her influences — Madonna, Gwen Stefani, Grace Jones, David Bowie, Queen — but blends the past into something fresh and exciting.

“What makes Gaga different from Madonna is that she’s a performance artist operating in the mainstream,” says celebrity gossip blogger Perez Hilton. “She takes Grace Jones and Yoko Ono and makes it pop.”

In a world full of meteoric-rise stories, Gaga’s seems one of the most improbable.

It began in 2006, when New Jersey-based record producer Rob Fusari was looking for a sexy rock ‘n’ roll heroine with tousled hair, sleepy eyes and garage band chops to front a female version of the rock band The Strokes.

Instead, he got a chunky girl named Stefani Germanotta with a bouffant, dark eyeliner and a look more guido than grunge. She had taken a 40-minute bus ride to his studio in Parsippany, and he wanted to let her down easy.

“I’m thinking, ‘How can I cut this short and still make her feel like it was worth coming all the way out here?’ ” says Fusari, who has worked with Beyoncé, Will Smith and Whitney Houston. “She was bubbly and nice, but not what I was looking for at all.”

Then she sat down at the piano.

“It was like the Earth had stopped,” he says. “I’m listening to the lyrics and I’m thinking, ‘holy s—, this is something new.’
She was amazing. I said, ‘Play me another song.’ As she’s playing, I’m texting my lawyer, ‘I need a contract tomorrow.’ “

In the months that followed, Fusari helped Germanotta morph into Lady Gaga, pop phenom.

Not long ago, Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta waited tables on Cornelia St.

Now, her addictive dance beats, intriguing lyrics and outrageous costumes are reshaping music and fashion. Gaga is the first artist in Billboard Top 40 Airplay Chart history whose first five singles made No. 1.

In a little over a year, her debut album, “The Fame,” has sold more than 8 million copies.

The 23-year-old superstar just finished the North American leg of her “Monster Ball Tour” with four soldout shows at Radio City Music Hall that brought out legions of fans — from tweens to drag queens — in Gaga regalia. She’ll soon head to Europe, Australia and Japan to perform.

She was always gaga for music.

Lady Gaga took up piano at 4 and was writing music by the time she was 13. She danced around fancy West Side restaurants using breadsticks as batons and, in a preview of things to come, greeted baby-sitters naked.

She attended Convent of the Sacred Heart, whose past students include Caroline Kennedy, and Paris and Nicky Hilton.

Lady Gaga likes to portray herself as a weirdo who didn’t fit in, but an old friend says she was popular — and serious about her art.

“She was always the star of the plays and musicals in high school,” the friend says. “As soon as she would get in costume, she would be in character and would never break.”

School plays weren’t enough, so Gaga organized the school’s “Cafe Casa” nights.

“She recruited singers, songwriters, actors, dancers and filmmakers at Sacred Heart and other schools to showcase their work,” the friend says.

Gaga dropped out of NYU’s Tisch School of the Arts to polish her songwriting and performance skills at downtown clubs.

She was still Stefani Germanotta then, and she looked and sounded more like Norah Jones than Lady Gaga, but was building the foundation for her future.

“She was learning how to put on a show,” says Bitter End owner Kenny Gorka. “She learned to get people to listen.”

Singer Wendy Starland saw Gaga perform at the old Flatiron club called the Cutting Room and was blown away. She called Fusari and put Gaga on the phone.

Before long, Gaga was riding the bus to Jersey every day to work at his studio. Fusari thought she wrote brilliant songs — but with no commercial appeal. He told her to abandon rock riffs and add dance beats. Gaga refused.

Fusari convinced her a drum machine would not hurt her integrity, telling her Queen used one.

“I think that’s what finally got her to give it a shot,” Fusari says. “We finished ‘Beautiful, Dirty, Rich’ that day. It’s one of the songs on her debut album.”

Music wasn’t her only passion: Gaga talked constantly about creating a look that would get people talking — and her wardrobe became bizarre.

During a trip to Miami, Fusari says he told Gaga he didn’t want to be seen with her as they walked to a drug store because she looked like a kinky hooker.

“She’s in the bathing suit with a ripped-up jean skirt with one leg attached. She had on this crazy hat. She was wearing heels that went all the way to the ceiling … I told her I didn’t want to walk with her, so she went in ahead of me.”

Fusari also takes credit for creating the “Lady Gaga” name. He would always greet his protege with Queen’s “Radio Ga Ga” when she arrived at the studio. One day his phone’s spell check changed “Radio” to “Lady.”

“She told me, ‘That’s it,’” Fusari says. “‘Don’t ever call me Stefani again.’”

Fusari played Gaga’s music for executives at Island Def Jam, who gave her a contract, but severed it after a few months without explanation. Gaga’s confidence was bruised, but Fusari encouraged her to keep writing and recording.

Fusari liked the direction Lady Gaga’s music was taking, but not the direction of her life. She had hooked up with hard rock DJ Lady Starlight, a staple of the downtown nightlife scene.

They performed as a burlesque revue. Lady Gaga, in leopard-skin G-strings and bikini tops, danced and set cans of hairspray on fire. Gaga’s music was the soundtrack for a hipster strip show.

Lady Gaga admits she was partying like, well, a rock star, using mountains of drugs.

Her father, Joe, freaked out by the burlesque act and the dope, told her she was screwing up her life and didn’t speak to her for months. Her mom, Cynthia, gave Gaga unconditional love and support, but she, too, was worried her daughter was on a dark path.

Her dad’s disapproval eventually convinced Gaga that her talent was a fragile thing, that drugs could destroy her career. She pulled back on partying and threw herself into music.

When she played the Bitter End, her hair was long and dark, like scores of other female singers who have performed at the historic Bleecker St. club.

Germanotta’s vocals were raw and her dance moves unpolished, but owner Gorka saw something special — a hunger for success.

“When somebody is that driven you can almost put money down that something good will happen,” he says.

The question is whether she’ll have the longevity of Madonna or Bowie, or be just a passing fancy.

Fusari thinks she has the talent to stay on top, but must mix things up, the way Elton John bounces between looks and sounds.

One approach is to go back to piano-driven songs. Gaga apparently agrees; her next single is “Speechless,” a piano ballad.

“She doesn’t need to sell 8 million records the next time around,” Fusari says.

“The record I really want her to make is something with Jack White (of the White Stripes). Something with a hard electric guitar over piano. It would make people go ‘Whoa.’ She is going to amaze people for years to come.”

AC/DC singer attacks Bono and Bob Geldof over charity lectures

February 3, 2010 by stevenl154
Bono of U2: confirmed as Glastonbury headliners

Sophie Tedmanson in Sydney/Times on line

The singers Bono and Bob Geldof have incurred the wrath of Brian Johnson, a fellow rock star and frontman of AC/DC, over their celebrity activism.

Johnson, the gravel-voiced British singer of Australia’s biggest rock band, has joined a growing group of critics of Geldof and the U2 singer over their very public charity work, saying they should stop lecturing audiences about charity work and instead do their good deeds in private.

“I do it myself, I don’t tell everybody I’m doing it,” Johnson, 62, told Melbourne’s Herald Sun newspaper.

“I don’t tell everybody they should give money – they can’t afford it. When I was a working man I didn’t want to go to a concert for some bastard to talk down to me that I should be thinking of some kid in Africa.”

He then offered some words of advice to his fellow rockers: “I’m sorry mate, do it yourself, spend some of your own money and get it done. It just makes me angry. I become all tyrannical.”

AC/DC were asked to play at the Live Aid concert in 1985, but turned down the chance to play at the charity event, which raised an estimated £100 million for famine relief and made an international celebrity activist out of Geldof.

Johnson described Geldof, who also organised the Live 8 benefit concerts in support of the Make Poverty History campaign in 2005, as a “canny lad”.

“He did what he though was right at the time but it didn’t work,” Johnson said of Geldof’s Live Aid concert. “The money didn’t go to poor people. It makes me mad when people try to use politics or charity for publicity. Do a charity gig, fair enough, but not on worldwide television.”

Johnson’s tirade against the two Irish multi-millionaires is not the first time their charitable work has earned them criticism for letting their egos get in the way of campaigns.

Bono, who regularly lobbies governments on behalf of the world’s poor, is a fixture of the annual G8 summits, has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize three times and has an honorary knighthood, was also attacked by the author Paul Theroux in 2005.

Theroux claimed the U2 singer was part of a group of celebrity “mythomaniacs, people who wish to convince the world of their worth”, and accused him of perpetuating the lie that Africa was fatally troubled and could only be saved by outside help.

Bono responded by calling his critics “cranks carping from the sidelines”, during an interview with the Times in 2006.

“A lot of them wouldn’t know what to do if they were on the field. They’re the party who will always be in opposition so they’ll never have to take responsibility for decisions because they know they’ll never be able to implement them,” Bono said.

The Lessons of Lady Gaga

January 29, 2010 by stevenl154

 JANUARY 29, 2010 / WSJ

With digital dominance, business savvy, a niche-busting sound and 1,001 wardrobe changes, she is a new model for success

Pay attention to that woman opening the Grammys.

At Sunday’s awards show, Lady Gaga is expected to play a duet on a single piano with Elton John. She is nominated for five awards, including record of the year, but that’s less important than her broader impact on music culture in the space of a year, which has been seismic.

Her debut album has generated four No. 1 songs. She topped the digital sales chart for 2009 with 15.3 million tracks sold. Her dance hits, including “Poker Face” and “Paparazzi,” recalibrated the sound of pop radio with a spacey Euro vibe that’s crept into songs by rock and rap artists. She grabbed attention beyond the music world with outfits that make her look like a refugee from a sci-fi film. In concert, on video and at past awards shows she has sported full facial masks, worn planetary rings around her head, and framed her face in what looked like a bird’s nest.

“She’s very vaudevillian,” says an admiring Alice Cooper, the rocker whose history of stage theatrics includes simulated decapitations. But he says Gaga’s antics only work because “she can really sing.”

WSJ’s John Jurgensen joins the News Hub and tells Simon Constable why the music industry loves Lady Gaga. He discusses how the singer is a case study in how the business has changed.

Gaga may turn out to be yet another fleeting pop novelty, but many other industry veterans see her as the real deal, and her ambitions and skill at navigating the turbulent industry may make her a durable star. Born Stefani Germanotta, she graduated from Manhattan’s Convent of the Sacred Heart school, then left a music program at New York University to chase a music career. She was signed and dropped from one label, Def Jam, before uniting with a core team of advisers. She then stormed the media in a year when Michael Jackson’s death reminded us how few new music stars transcend narrow genres anymore.

Underneath Gaga’s haystack wigs is a case study of what it takes to succeed in the music business today. Gaga, 23 years old, has made shrewd use of new digital platforms, while still leveraging the clout of a major label, an institution deemed obsolete by many proponents of DIY culture. She is a product of a new kind of recording contract which goes beyond just selling records to encompass everything from touring, merchandise–even her make-up deal. Though she writes her own material, she is as focused on visual theatrics, fashion, and global appeal as she is on the music.

Gaga’s actual odds in the Grammy race are uncertain. For instance, the best-album award typically goes to nominees with a long record of achievement, including recent winners Robert Plant, Alison Krauss and Herbie Hancock. This year, the senior slot is represented by Dave Matthews. Another strong contender: Beyoncé Knowles, who at just 28 is a veteran who leads the pack with 10 nominations. The Black Eyed Peas are reliable hitmakers with a bevy of corporate sponsors including BlackBerry. Newcomer Taylor Swift, the 20-year-old country singer, also has a strong shot at awards.

This year, expect the cameras to hover around Gaga, who will be challenged to top the six different costumes she donned at the MTV Video Music Awards. Divining fashion trends from her outfits would be fruitless. Instead, here are three things Gaga can tell us about how the music industry works now.

She’s a digital phenomenon

Lady Gaga’s towering digital sales, almost all of them iTunes downloads, only tell part of the story. In fact, much of Gaga’s audience got her music for free, and legally. They have listened to free streams—by the hundreds of millions—on YouTube and the other online services that Gaga currently leads, according to research firm BigChampagne. On MySpace, Gaga has had 321.5 million plays. By contrast, singer Susan Boyle tallied only 133,000 plays, despite scoring the No. 2 selling album of 2009. A difference (among many) between Gaga and the dowdy Scotswoman discovered on a British talent show: Ms. Boyle’s material, including “Amazing Grace,” was traditional—and so were most of her buyers. Some 97% of her albums were sold on compact disc.

“That tells you how pronounced the generational divide is,” says BigChampagne founder Eric Garland. When it comes to the free streams that dwarf her still-impressive sales, Gaga isn’t giving it away for nothing—musicians typically earn fractions of a penny each time a song is streamed on Yahoo, for instance. While most artists stand to profit more from high-margin CD sales, being embedded across the Web can pay dividends in exposure and the loyalty of fans.

She’s got a 360-degree view

The business needs more Gagas. The upheaval of the last decade has forced the major record companies to cut their work force by 60%, according to a recent report by the Recording Industry Association of America. Within the last week, dozens of Universal Music Group employees were laid off. (Gaga’s own publicist took a buyout; his job won’t be filled.) Labels have had to change their relationship with artists and lean on new partners, including the talent managers they often squabbled with in the past.

Without the budget and staff to support their once overloaded artist stables, labels have slashed their rosters and doubled down on acts expected to drive hits. They’re also going after the money artists generate outside the labels’ traditional business of selling music. This has given rise to, in industry parlance, the 360 deal, in which a label invests more money up front (for marketing, for example) in exchange for a piece of merchandise sales, touring revenue and other earnings that artists had long kept for themselves.

The 360 model hasn’t launched big stars yet—with a few exceptions, including Gaga. From concerts, including four sold-out nights at Radio City Music Hall this month, a percentage of her take goes to her label, Universal’s Interscope Records. The label also gets a cut of her revenue from Polaroid, Estée Lauder’s MAC and other corporate partners. Does Gaga validate the 360 model for other artists? While she pockets relatively less money on tour, Interscope puts more muscle behind her than it would have in the old days. “Would she be in the position to play in front of 20,000 people a night if the record company had not put up the marketing dollars?” says Gaga’s manager Troy Carter.

She could be the next Madonna

On the song “Bad Romance,” Gaga chants “I want your ugly, I want your disease.” She lovingly refers to her fans as “monsters.” On stage, she bleeds from simulated stab wounds. Despite these dark theatrics, she’s become a darling of mainstream radio by drawing from Madonna’s playbook, with thumping dance beats, a shape-shifting image and a playful obsession with celebrity.

While Ms. Swift represents the pretty (but friendly!) girl next door, Gaga’s allure is that of a misfit run amok in the system, a role that has helped her cut across disparate subcultures, including teens, finicky hipsters and gays, to whom she sends frequent shout-outs. While Gaga’s bared skin and professed androgyny have raised the eyebrows of interviewers like Oprah Winfrey and Barbara Walters, she isn’t shocking, per se.

“That’s a tool that’s no longer available to pop artists,” says Danny Goldberg, the longtime manager and former label head. Since rap music, he adds, “those taboos have been removed and that, to me, makes her that much more impressive. She doesn’t have that easy ticket to notoriety.”

She’s also determined not to be niche. Last year, the Recording Academy’s nominating committees received a record 17,000 Grammy submissions. Many of those hopefuls hailed from what could be called music’s growing middle class—made up of acts that carve out niche audiences within subgenres such as indie rock. Only a few artists, including Ms. Swift, have defied that trend as newly minted superstars. While some acts try to get there with experimental strategies, such as giving music away free, Gaga used an old technique: cementing her image in music videos such as “Paparazzi,” in which she hobbles on crutches.

RedOne, Gaga’s primary producer, hails from Morocco and has an outsider’s take on American music. “The songs have to be lyrically simple and easy to sing along to, even for people in the world who don’t speak English,” he says. Studio pros like Grammy-winning mixing engineer Manny Marroquin are being hired to replicate her chopping synths and densely-layered sound. “Everybody’s saying, ‘Make it like Gaga,’ ” he says.

Such a now-trendy sound won’t last forever. Gaga’s longevity will hinge on evolving before its expiration date. Alice Cooper suggests softening things up: “I’d love to hear her sing a Karen Carpenter song.” In fact, before she was Lady Gaga, Ms. Germanotta was a piano-playing singer-songwriter who haunted open mics in New York. Rather than attempt to outdo her own outlandish antics, Gaga may dial back toward that former persona. Next month, for instance, she’ll begin pushing the single “Speechless,” a stormy piano ballad in the mode of Sir Elton.

Says Tom Corson, executive vice president and general manager of RCA Music Group, a rival to Gaga’s label: “It’s not just about great songs. In the best-case scenario, it’s a full multimedia package.”

The Grammys 2010

January 29, 2010 by stevenl154

Recording Academy eyes future of downloads, mixtapes

By STEVE CHAGOLLAN/ Variety

This year marks a turning point of sorts for the Grammys, and the organization behind it, the 18,000-member strong Recording Academy.

This could be the last year that the record business, as we know it, ascends the stage at Staple Center, which hosts the ceremony Sunday night, to bask in self-adulation.

Earlier this week, the all-star “Hope for Haiti Now” topped the album charts at 171,000 downloads, becoming the first-ever digital-only collection to bow at No. 1. In December, Ke$ha’s “Tik Tok” notched 610,000 downloads in the course of a week for the biggest track sales week by any female artist in history.

Which begs the question: With the Recording Academy’s previous emphasis on, well, recordings as physical packages — with teams of producers and the requisite studio polish — what will be the new definition of a recording? And will digital-only productions threaten the label execs, producers and technicians who make up the bulk of Academy voters?

Already, there are signs that the Recording Academy is breaking free from its traditional moorings.

For the first time, it’s embraced, in the rap solo category, two songs that originated as free, self-produced mixtapes: Kid Cudi’s “Day N’ Night” and Drake’s “Best I Ever Had.” Granted, both were subsequently re-released in standard physical form with the backing of major labels. But their very presence among the contenders suggests a more forward-looking outlook by an organization thought strictly old school by many.

“In the past, to the extent that distribution models have changed, we’ve changed the way we review digital releases,” said Neil Portnow, prexy-CEO of the Recording Academy. “A number of years ago, we allowed the inclusion of albums and tracks that were distributed in a digital fashion. We try to be nimble, and certainly, if not ahead of the curve, with the curve, as things change.”

And with specialty retailers giving way to big-box stores like Target and Walmart, it’s no coincidence that the Recording Academy is directing viewers to Target for the 3-D glasses they’ll need to get the full effect of the Grammycast’s Michael Jackson tribute.

The Grammys will need those hipster Target shoppers and Twitter users if it wants to overcome general awards attrition due to the saturation of kudocasts over the last decade, and a public used to seeing ubiquitous acts like Grammy nominees the Black Eye Peas and Taylor Swift with the punch of a keystroke.

Over the last 10 years, average viewership for the telecast has been about 22 million annually. Grammy viewership peaked at 51.7 million in 1984, the year of Michael Jackson’s “Thriller,” when the Big Three nets still dominated the airwaves. No year has come even close since.

The Recording Academy has also sought to reach out via Twitter, Facebook and MySpace to younger fans — the very consumers most inclined to buy their music electronically. In a similar vein, it has initiated a Grammy University Network, with 4,000 members affiliated with 350 universities. “It’s a way of getting closer to that generation,” explained Portnow. “For us, it’s a farm team. Hopefully, a lot of those young people will actually wind up with careers in music and will already be part of our organization.”

This, along with the Academy’s diversity outreach — encompassing age, ethnicity gender and genre of music — has resulted, says Portnow, in a crop of 2009 Grammy nominees with a decidedly younger skew. Artists like Lady Gaga, Maxwell and the Kings of Leon have supplanted more established names like Springsteen, U2 and Dylan in the top four categories.

“With anything institutional like the Academy,” said Portnow, “you have to freshen up, reinvent and continue to put a more interesting, more contemporary face on what you do so you not only hold and maintain your existing audience but you attract a new and younger one.”